@stephenjudkins i think the right conversation is about the quality of exposure. with better air quality, might all of our inevitable, repeated, exposure be more likely to be variolating rather than disease-causing?

in reply to @stephenjudkins

@keyclocker large laxative model! (i don’t know? i guess we’ll all have to kind of feel it out.)

in reply to @keyclocker

having an LLM do your writing for you is like having a robot do your pooping.

the product may be indistinguishable from or even higher quality than your own, but still it won’t quite work.

@nurettin (i hope you appreciated that toot was ironic?)

in reply to @nurettin

the devil pays well but you are never happy.

@zorinlynx careful! big trouble!

in reply to @zorinlynx

groups of people — including professions — that let individual incentives guide their action will always be playthings of the rich and powerful, who are able to set incentives. agency in our actual world requires collective action, and shame on journalists as a profession for failing to step up. journa.host/@w7voa/11008558385 ht @alexwild @mtsw

act like it’s absurd to consider Michelangelo’s David pornographic, but they conveniently leave out the that David is not only nude but hard.

they say stalking is a crime but everywhere i turn i’m there and the police do nothing to be honest i’m a little creeped out.

an approach to limiting Section 230 that people mad because Section 230 let platforms take down Trump would absolutely hate. maybe you only get the immunity if you try to take down Trump! mstdn.social/@kissane/11008210

@maxbsawicky Gack! Max Speak You Listen! I am very sorry to you both!

in reply to @maxbsawicky

@jordancox Thank you for the correction!

in reply to @jordancox

@jordancox Oh shoot! I think you are right! Max Sawicky's blog used to be called Max Read or something like that, so I assumed. But it looks like maybe this literally is a Max Read!

in reply to @jordancox

@djc i think it's general! firms can make confidential particular business-sensitive information, but can't suppress employee speech about firms broadly, even by contract, is the ruling as i understand it (but only from reading this piece!)

in reply to @djc

because i like to reveal people's secrets. notes.jakerusso.com/

@neilk who will bail out Big LSD?

in reply to @neilk

“Non-Disparagement Clauses Are Retroactively Voided, NLRB’s Top Cop Clarifies” by vice.com/en/article/n7ewy7/non ht

// this is great

I don't think American social media should be surveillance for, and subtly manipulable by, plutocrats.

"There’s a reason planning in Northern Europe has converged on the hourly, or at worst two-hourly, frequency as the basis of regional and intercity timetabling: passengers who can afford cars need the flexibility of frequency to be enticed to take the train." @Alon pedestrianobservations.com/202

@mmasnick I don't favor Utah's law.

But I'm not sure this kind of response is persuasive.

in reply to @mmasnick